Expertise's Politics and Sports Blog

Sunday, November 14, 2004
Tonight's fights and NFL picks.

Don King put on a 4 heavyweight match fight card tonight, pitting Hasim Rahman vs. Kali Meehan, Evander Holyfield vs. Larry Donald, John Ruiz vs. Andrew Golata, and Chris Byrd vs. Jameel McCline.

Believe me folks, this is the worst the heavyweight division has ever looked since the early 80's, during the period when Larry Holmes retired and before Tyson became a monster.  It doesn't look like it's going to get any better anytime soon, either.  Rahman dominated his fight as he should have, winning by a 4th round KO.  However, the other three were embarrassing.

Chris Byrd retained his IBF title despite hitting the canvas in the second round and won by a very narrow decision.  The AP had Byrd winning the fight by a couple of rounds, due to his boxing prowess. 

And John Ruiz has proved to be one of the biggest embarrassments to be considered a heavyweight champion, sliding past Andrew Golata despite being knocked down twice and being penalized by a low blow.  And he did it by turning the fight into a cirus in which the ref had to throw his trainer out of the arena after he first threw a punch at Golata's trainer in the first round, and kept arguing with the ref until he was thrown out in the eighth.  And after Ruiz was knocked down in the second he continued to fight that same dirty grabbing style and afterwards got a little love from the judges. 

Golata was surprised.  So was the AP, as they had him winning the fight.  And note, this was the second time he got robbed by a Don King fighter, as his fight against Chris Byrd was a draw.  Golata won't win a fight with them unless he knocks them out.

UPDATE:  I forgot the third fight.  Holyfield got embarrassed by unknown Larry Donald.  Someone needs to force Holyfield to retire.  This is becoming a joke.

Anyway, on to the NFL.  Here are my picks for today:

- Tampa Bay over Atlanta

- Pittsburgh over Cleveland

- Indy over Houston

- Jacksonville over Detroit (I'm not sure bout this one folks, but I'll go with the favorite)

- KC over NO

- Baltimore over Jets

- St. Louis over Seattle

- Titans over Chicago (not sure bout this one either)

- Redskins over Bengals

- Giants over Cards

- Minnesota over Green Bay

- Carolina over San Francisco (Toilet Bowl)

- New England over Buffalo (duh.)

And for Monday Night:

- Philly over Dallas

The games to watch are Minn/GB, St. Louis/Seattle, Balt/Jets, Pitt/Cleve (Roethlisberger will break rookie starting record if he wins today), and Car/San Fran (to see who will be the worst team in the league).  Philly/Dallas will more likely be a snoozer, so plan to go to bed early.

Posted at 02:55 am by Expertise
Leave a message  


Saturday, November 13, 2004
Tell me if this makes sense...

CBS News fired a senior producer earlier this week due to cutting into CSI: New York for a special report announcing Yasser Arafat's passing.

This could, and possibly should deserve criticism and a reprimand, since it wasn't a breaking news story considering Arafat's passing had been rumored for over a week.  And it probably did stop local affiliates from reporting the scoop on their late news.

But put it in perspective; this woman gets fired immediately, yet it's been over two months and Dan Rather, Mary Mapes, and Andrew Heyward still haven't received any kind of punishment for airing fake documents that would have embarassed the President of the United States less than two months before a hotly contested presidential election.  And CBS hasn't been criticized nearly as much for this slip-up by this producer as they have been for that "60 Minutes" story in September.

If only Dan Rather would have preempted CBS programming in order to do announce that they had found these documents, he would have been held accountable for his actions in a quicker manner.  At least the producer was concerned on getting the story right and properly informing the public.  Rather wasn't.  But I suppose all that really matters is that he still has his job and she doesn't. 

Gotta love those standards at CBS.

Posted at 02:48 am by Expertise
Comments (1)  


Thursday, November 11, 2004
Carole Simpson flips her wig.

Anyone heard about Carole Simpson lately?

Ole girl hasn't been looking too good lately, and it seems that ABSNews has put her on the back burner so she can run around harrassing little children.  An up-and-comer in the news industry during Bill Clinton's run for the White House in 92 and headed the first presidential townhall debate where Slick Willie's bullshit was in full view for probably the first time (have you seen that debate?  Check out this and fast foward to about 2:04 into it.).  You would have thought she was sprung by Slick Willie.

Anyway, she showed her behind at a forum covered by CSpan the other day in Washington.  It seems as if the ABS employee isn't as objective as most ABS employees have tried to suggest.

Here's some of what she said:

I look at this map, and I'm like, "What the heck is happening?" For the past year, I am bringing news into the schools. I was concerned that all research was showing young people in America are not watching the news; they're not reading the news, and this is frightening to me, from someone who got into journalism in the 1960s because we wanted to change America. We thought if people understood the problems, that we'd get solutions to some of the problems. So when I find out that our young people are noooot being aware of what's going on, um... ABC has allowed me to travel about this city, and I leave for a big red state tomorrow (Laughing) Missouri. (Laughing.)

One thing that irks me about journalists and news broadcasting today is that they feel it's their duty to change America.  America doesn't need to be changed, at least not by them.  Your job is to report the news.  Find a story, and tell people what happened.  It's not that hard, Carole. 

Call me crazy, but I think if people are given the problems in a fair, reasonable manner, they can find the solutions on their own.  *shrugs*

Here's some more:

They are chatting. They are on their phones constantly. They are talking to people on the phones. They're watching these reality shows. They are NOT watching the news. Then I'm going, "Oh, my God! Are our children going to grow up stupid?" and I don't say that to them, but when I hear some of their answers to questions, I'm like, "They still think that Saddam Hussein blew up the World Trade Center," and I'm telling you, I've been all over the country, and I'm like, "Oh, my God! How could they miss this?" and then I look at the election, and I'm going, "Well, of course our kids are not bright about these things because their parents aren't." Seventy percent of the people of America still believe that Saddam Hussein had something to do with the World Trade Center, and that's why we're at war, and I'm like, "Oh, my God! Nobody is looking at news."

Correction, Carole:  they aren't watching YOUR news.

And really, can you blame them?  The mainstream media has a serious problem with objectivity and credibility, and as you see further down, Simpson isn't helping this a bit.

Maybe Hussein didn't have anything to do with 9/11.  That's reasonable, although we don't know what Hussein knows, and we do know that he has have been aligned with terrorist organizations dating back to Mogadishu.  We also know that Al Qaeda agents and Hussein have met on several occasions, and that Abu Al-Zarqawi has held refuge in the country after 9/11, among other terrorists.  So it isn't surprising that people would think the worst of Hussein.  Regardless, that doesn't make them stupid because they believe it.  If anything, it makes Simpson naive.

Here's more:

The children are saying, "Well, I hear Rush Limbaugh," and I said that's not the news, and they go, "But he's talking about news things." Okay, that's really scary when I hear them say that they think they're getting the news. They can't make the separation between the New York Times and ABC News and NPR and the talk shows: Hannity & Colmes or Bill O'Reilly. It's all the same to them. It's all the news,. Entertainment Tonight. It's all the news. So it's been a very frightening thing to me. I am scared. I'm gonna admit to you that I'm scared.

Here's what Simpson doesn't get: the reason why people are turning to these shows isn't due to lack of enthusiam for news, but the interest to get the other side of the story. 

Also, she's "scared" because no one can see the difference between newspapers and talk shows.  What she doesn't realize is that talk shows rarely claim to be unopinionated.  In fact, they're quite up front about it, and it's easy to see.  The mainstream media claims to be unbiased, yet people see them as no different than those talk shows.  Maybe it's just me, but that says alot more about the supposed "unbiased" mainstream media than it does about those talk shows or the people watching them.


I got a little map here of pre-Civil War free versus slave states. I wish you could see it in color and large. But if you look at it, the red states are all done in the South, and you have the Nebraska territories, the New Mexico territories and the Kansas territories, but the Pacific Northwest and California were not slave states. The northeast was not. It looks like the map of 2004, and when you say, "Let's let the states decide," I remember what the states decided when they had slavery. I think they're going quickly after social programs, despite what he says. (tepid applause) I think we're going to get a roll back on all kind of things. Affirmative action is a bad word; liberal is a bad word; gay is a bad word, diversity. All these words that are perfectly fine words now are these touchstones, these trigger points, and that frightens me.

This, out of anything else Simpson has said, shows her outright bias against Republicans and their supporters.

I wrote about this last week on Northern Arc in regards to the leftist ego.  It's no wonder people from the South and the Heartland doesn't want to support Democrats or leftist ideals; the self-righteous attitude shown by people like Simpson will never add one vote in these areas.  The whiny-assed way leftists have behaved after Election Night will not add one vote in the South.  In fact, they could possibly see landslides throughout the South in 2006 and 2008.

To try to treat the South in 2004 as if it was 1860 reeks of nothing more than pure elitism.  Are there racists in the South?  Sure.  But they are the exception rather than the norm.  And it should be emphasized that there are still more Democrats in a number of Southern states and they still remain dominant in the state houses and legislatures throughout the South. 

Soimehow, the party that has dominated the South ever since Thomas Jefferson captured the presidency in 1800  - even throughout the Civil War, the Civil Rights Movement, and through the Reagan Presidency - has allowed the leadership of 1994-2004 to squelch their hold on it.  To undo the work of over 200 years takes a lot of hard work, albeit in a very short time.

And finally:

I have to tell you, I'm going to average schools. I don't want the bright schools. I don't want the kids that are in the selective high schools. I want the kids that are going to be average Americans and may hold a... a... blue-collar job or something and may not be going to college. But if that's the bulk of America, and they don't care -- and I'm trying to make them care and see how all of these things connect to them -- um, it's really scary. I may be reaching, out of the 4,000 students I've talked, to maybe 400 I've reached. That's a good number, I guess, if I've gotten to at least 10% of them. Umm, But it's scary to me. I'm... I'm really afraid and I'm afraid about this election.

Hey...did you notice how she snuck that "Talented Tenth" reference?  4,000 students she talked to, but only 400 students she "reached".  Right.  Elitism and self-righteousness can be a motha.  Maybe that other 90% wasn't feeding into her b.s. that day.

Check out part of Simpson's comments from The Daily Recycler and Simpson''s audio with commentary from Limbaugh's website.

Posted at 02:20 am by Expertise
Comments (3)  


Tuesday, November 09, 2004
NFL thoughts.

A few ponderings that I have:

I think there is no question in anyone's minds who the hottest team in the NFL is, and that's the Pittsburgh Steelers.  The additions of Ben Roethlisberger and Duce Staley were proven to put them over the top. 

Roethlisberger is having the same year Tom Brady had during the Patriots first Super Bowl run.  He's a pretty big guy, standing at 6'5 and weighing over 240, but can move with ease and can throw under pressure.  He currently has a 105.2 quarterback rating, which is good for a QB with years on his belt, and even better for a rookie.  I watched both the Eagles and Patriots games, and I thought he did a pretty decent job.

But the anchor of that offense is the ground game, and the Eagles showed they still can't stop the run.  Jerome Bettis is one of the best running backs of all time, as he's #6th in the all-time yardage for a RB and is guaranteed a spot in the Hall.  But considering all of the injuries and also being downgraded once Duce Staley came from Philly this year, it's a shame that Philly can not muster up enough to keep Bettis under 100 yards.  And it goes to show that Philly would probably be on a 2-game losing streak if Jamal Lewis wasn't serving his suspension for being charged with drug trafficking earlier this year.

But with all of that, Philly will still win the NFC East this year and will have home field throughout the playoffs.  The NFC is quite weak this year, as there is no one other than the Eagles that looks like they can contend for a Super Bowl.  The only ones that comes close to Philly is probably the Vikings, as long as Culpepper can keep launching bombs and outrunning defensive linemen.  However, they need a damn defense, which is why they lost last night's game against Indianapolis.

The cream of the crop:  Steelers, Pats, Eagles, Colts, Chargers.  I suppose alot of naysayers are apologizing to Marty Schottenheimer right about now, as the Chargers are now 6-3 after going 4-12 last year.

The toilet bowl:  Dolphins, Panthers, Niners, Cows, Cards.  Four of those five are in the NFC.  Which one will be the last to get Win 2:  the Dolphins, Niners, or the Panthers?  Ugh.  Right now, the Panthers are just finding ways to lose games.  I know they've lost 10 guys to injury, but when you lose games in such a fashion as they've been doing, that's no excuse.  You don't need to be skilled to avoid penalties.

I'll have more later this week, including my picks.

Posted at 07:26 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  


Monday, November 08, 2004
LGF alerts AP journalist photos of insurgent attacks.

This is absolutely reprehensible.  I can't imagine any journalist in their right minds that would stand there and shoot pictures while insurgents attack our troops (hat tip: Little Green Footballs.  Pictures are via Yahoo):

And this journalist, Bilal Hussein, just stands there while they do this!

I'm not saying he should do something about it.  But it would be very hard for me or any self-respected journalist to sit there while this scum continues to try to kill off our servicemen; the same servicemen that keep our country safe so his punk ass can have a job.

Posted at 11:00 pm by Expertise
Comments (1)  


The battle for Fallujah.

Let's hope our servicemen get it done this time.

We should have never let Fallujah and Ramadhi get out of control like that in the first place.  Now that the election is over, it's time to raise hell in that place.

Check out Hammorabi to find out the latest.  He's an Iraqi blogger that probably has the best insight into what's going on in Iraq.  He got harrassed today by an emailer, but I know he will continue on telling the truth about the slime that is creating terror throughout Iraq.  The Messopotamian and Healing Iraq are good ones too, with plenty of information and good punditry.

Earlier today, Allawi publicly gave permission to U.S. troops to go into Fallujah and clear it out.  This afternoon, Rumsfeld followed it up with a press conference in Washington, saying that the insurgency must end.

The troops are taking their time, as they have adding onto the air campaign they've used for the last couple of weeks, and on the ground they've closed off all points out of Fallujah.  Everyone inside is trapped.  They have already secured the western border of Fallujah, taking the main bridge and also a couple of hospitals.  Already there are complaints by leftists because military officials said doctors can not go out into the combat zone to treat the injured.

The AP is reporting today that troops have taken a couple of neighborhoods, and Marines can be visibly seen on rooftops.  Power has been cut off in the whole city, possibly setting up a humanitarian crisis because businesses have been closed for the last two days.  Richard Myers, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and U.S. Iraq Commander Gen. George Casey feel they will get into the most aggressive fighting in the next couple of days.

We'll see what happens then, but regardless, there is no doubt that they need to finish the ones that are in those two cities off.  Now will this effectively end the terror?  No, but it will mortally damage them so that we can finally capture and kill the heads of these terrorist militias.  Let's do this so we can finally have peaceful elections on January 29th.

Posted at 10:36 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  


Friday, November 05, 2004
The Leftist Ego.

This column should be up on sometime this evening.

The Leftist Ego
By Expertise

I used to work at a pretty popular restaurant in Atlanta a few years ago. It was a pretty busy place, and once I got used to the stress and demands of serving, it was a pretty decent place to work.

One day I was cleaning up after the lunch rush, and a female coworker who had the section right beside mine and I were making small talk. She was a big-boned chick, and of course kats like her “bones”, and she was dark-skinned. I never paid her much attention, however.

So all of a sudden, she blurts out, “You know, I think you’re gay.”

It kind of took me by surprise. “Oh? Why do you say that?”

“Because all the other guys here (at work) flirt and hit on me and shit, and you never do that. I figured you must be gay.”

Now when she said that, I started laughing. Not hard, but just a chuckle. I didn’t know what else to do. I mean, was she REALLY serious?

So I replied, “I always knew Atlanta women had egos, but I didn’t think they’d get as big as yours. I mean, did it not cross your mind that I might not be attracted to you? That you might not be my type?”

When I said that, her face fell. I hurt her feelings. But what are you to do when egomaniacs try to paint you as different or possibly inferior because you don’t act the way they expect you to act?

Such is the case with leftists after Election Night. When they say something, you’re not supposed to question it. You’re supposed to shut up and get behind it. And when you don’t, you’re stupid, you’re ignorant, you’re a backwoods country hick with no formal education and gets intimate with your cousins. If that’s how you think, fine. But don’t sit there and whine afterwards when you take heavy losses in the same states and regions that you insult.

The reason Democrats got swept in the South and in the Heartland is real simple; they want to force their message upon people rather than listening to what people think and then adjusting their message to cater them. The South was owned by the Democratic Party since Thomas Jefferson was president. Now, there are only four U.S. Senators in the South that are Democrats.

Instead of learning from the drubbing they took from the Republicans and the majority of the populace, they instead engage in self-righteousness and think the people that voted are the problems, not them. And it didn’t take them any time at all to do so. Whether it was post-election rallies in San Francisco with signs saying “Fuck Middle America” or “Can We Secede Already?”, the writers at talking about “the unteachable ignorance of the Red States”, or a British newspaper/tabloid asking how 59 million people could be so stupid, the left is only digging themselves into a bigger hole with their pretentiousness and disdain.

Aren’t they supposed to be the champions of the poor and disadvantaged? That’s what they claim. But a significant amount of the majority that voted against them are lower-income earners. They don’t consider the Democrats their champion. It goes to show that saying you are and actually being it are two different things.

The Democrats look across the ocean to Europe and see the dream that has evaded them; a populace that looks to the left to take care of them and address every single need they want. But there is a significant difference between Europe and America: European countries were often started through monarchies and empires. America was founded on the idea of individual empowerment. You can not approach Americans the same as you do Europeans.

Until the Democratic Party realizes this, they will continue to be locked out of most of this country and confined to New England and the West Coast. This time it was the Southern states in the Senate. In 08 they risk losing the Great Lake states (Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania) and possibly others.

If leftists don’t get off of their high horse, they soon won’t have a horse to ride at all.

Posted at 02:20 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  


Now that the election is over...

I feel like I can start cutting up again.

Therefore, without further adieu, I give you Toccara, from America's Next Top Model:

I bet you see why I watch this show now, huh?

This gives me TWO things to thank Ohio for.  And thank God for plus-sized models. :-D

Posted at 02:08 am by Expertise
Leave a message  


Wednesday, November 03, 2004
More post-election analysis.

I'm telling you don't know how relieved I am.

Not simply because Bush has been reelected, but because the whole election is over.  I don't mind the partisanship.  So what.  Elections are based on the confrontation of two people/parties with opposing viewpoints.  Get over it. 

I talked to my uncle last night.  He's home on leave from Baghdad until the 18th.  He is a 56 yr old National Guard who was activated and sent to Iraq in April and hopefully he'll be back home for good by the end of the year.  Every time the Democrats trashed Bush's National Guard service, I thought of him.  I thought about whether or not I wanted Kerry and the anti-war left to be in control of his fate while he is there.  I wondered whether or not he would have to go back, or even go to another country because of left-wing idiocy and "nuiance" by John Kerry.  There was no way I could vote for a guy like that, and neither did any of my family.

So if that means we must be forceful and voice our convictions as to what a mistake it is to allow the far left in this country to gain control of the White House, so be it.  If people are going to be pissed off, tough luck.  They'll have to get over it.  There was too much at stake to allow the left to win last night.  If they got their feelings hurt, they'll have to suck it up and learn from their mistakes.  And those mistakes does not include being too moderate.  It means doing what's best for America instead of what's best for the Democratic Party.

Having said that, I'm glad it's over.  I'm just burnt out about election talk.  And finally, that "nuisance" that was the fraud named John Kerry can finally get out of the spotlight and we can worry about finally finishing what we started in Iraq and hopefully get it at least as stable as Afghanistan is.

That means Bush can't fuck around with Fallujah any longer, and he must stem the insurgency from any rebel Shiites.  That means Zarqawi needs to be a dead man by the January elections.  Bush will be pretty busy now, because there will be several resignations from his cabinet (Drudge is reporting that Ashcroft is about to resign, but I'd take that with a grain of salt.), a possible Supreme Court resignation coming at any time, and having to get Iraq prepared in time for the elections, which will be the next bulletpoint.

However, that massive asswhupping the Democrats got in Congress makes it a little easier.  They'll fight like hell for the S.C. nomination, but it won't be too bad, and Bush should eventually get it, right?  I mean, they have an 10 seat advantage in the Senate (11 if you count Jeffords as an independent).  It shouldn't be that hard to find 5 Senators to break a filibuster, right?

Let's hope so.

Anyway, the Democrats will recoup, and they'll be the happy shiny opportunists and frauds we all know and love.  However, let's savor the moment.

In other post-election news:

   - Michael Moore is still pissed.  Is he figuring out that he can't alter an election?  How is he gonna spin this defeat?  Blame it on Kerry?

   - More about exit polls.  Hopefully this will get rid of them forever.  They were so wrong it wasn't even funny.  And I still reiterate that John Zogby looked like a fool during this whole election period by trying to make himself the story rather than the actual opinion of the nation.

Anyone that looked at the polling trends knew that Kerry didn't have the support of the majority of the nation.  However, I thought he'd have enough support to pull Ohio, in which the voter fraud stories had popped up so many times that I thought Bush would get robbed of it and thus lose the election.  And thank goodness for poll watchers; they probably saved the election for Bush.

However, that doesn't mean the left-wing bloggers should get the blame for it, as they supposedly put up fake exit poll results.  Well, then again, they do deserve some of it.  However, the media gets the blame too for not researching it before they reported them.  And it didn't help things when Zogby's ass was running around Tuesday afternoon saying Kerry would get 311 electoral votes.  He put out this lame assed excuse today.

   - I don't know whether to criticize the media for states they would orginally would have given Kerry if he was leading under the same margins as Bush or just give them the benefit of the doubt because they were trying to be cautious because of the criticism of Election 2000. 

I will say this; Election 2000 wasn't a fuck-up simply due to them calling Florida early.  It was a fuck-up because they tried to call it before polling had closed.  It was a good thing to not call a state once the precincts were actually empty rather than just after the closing hour.

But let's be real; once Bush was still up by 200,000 votes after Broward County had reported in Florida, it was a safe bet that Bush had clinched it.  But they didn't call Florida until 98% of the precincts had reported.  They turned themselves into an embarrassment by that time.  And Fox News called Ohio for Bush around 1:00 last night.  I woke up this morning around 6:30 and none of the other networks had even called Ohio even then.  Hell; I still don't think Iowa has finally been given to Bush.

I was right.  The AP still hasn't given Bush Iowa.  Oh well.  I think the media has gone from one extreme to another.

   - but there is one positive about election night:  Dan Rather.  If he isn't the funniest kat on Election Night I don't know who is.  Have you ever sat down and listened to all of the Ratherisms that is said?  If he retired and just came back for Election Night, CBS would be a better place.  But alas, they were still in third place last night.

All in all, the next four years will probably be as interesting as the first four.  I'm glad that Bush's revenge is complete from the defeat of the Democrats in 92, and I'll probably will never doubt him getting a goal done ever again.  I don't know whether to thank him, the Architect, or Melman.

Posted at 11:54 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  


Thank goodness.

I'm not going to lie; I thought Bush was a goner after this weekend.  I was watching the poll numbers drop on Fox News all weekend and then noticed which states he had to get in order to win.

Bush almost didn't need Ohio.  The combination of Nevada, New Mexico, and Iowa - two of those states didn't vote for him - was almost enough to seal the deal.  But no matter.

But here's the surprising thing:  do you know what pushed Bush over the top?

Social issues.  Yeah.

Particularly the anti-gay marriage movement.  11 states had that on the ballot, and one of them was Ohio.  There's no doubt in my mind that Bush would have been in trouble of that wasn't on the same ballot as the presidential election.

The Democrats have tough times ahead.  Not only did they fail to capture the presidency, but they got swept in all five Senate races in the South and then drop three state legislatures.  It looks like they will be down by 10 seats in the Senate.  Wicked.

The Democrats have three problems do deal with in the next 20 years:

1.  Turnout.  That boogeyman ain't scaring anyone anymore.  You had the largest voter turnout since 1960, and Bush still beat them by about...3-4 million votes.

2.  Population.  The South will continue to grow.  So will the Mountains and Midwest.  However, the North will continue to shrink.  That means more electoral votes in Republican strongholds.

3.  Social issues.  See above.
Maybe the Democrats will learn their lesson.  But I was thinking they would after they got smoked in 2002 in much the same way, and they pull out Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean.  So they probably won't for another four years or so.

The biggest losers were the pollsters.  John Zogby looked like a damned fool, and the exit polls were dead wrong.  I'll have more about that later though.  Bush is about to start his victory speech in a second.

Posted at 03:01 pm by Expertise
Leave a message  


Next Page


Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

rss feed


Weblog Commenting and Trackback by